Hello

New to the Kia Niro Forums? Introduce yourself here
kennyg
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:29 am

Hello

Post by kennyg » Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:39 am

We have just purchased a 2017 First edition. Personally I would have preferred a Niro 2 but the prospect of heated seats was too big a temptation for the other half. I have read that the Niro 2 returns better MPG and has a better ride due to it's 16" wheels. Is there any substance to this?


djbobbins
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 7:57 pm

Re: Hello

Post by djbobbins » Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:00 pm

I drove a first edition on the test drive but opted for a 2 owing to lower company car tax. Miss my heated seats that I had in the Skoda Yeti before...

I didn’t find the ride on the test drive terrible - it was quite a while between then and taking delivery of my car but I don’t recall it being a huge amount different. Likewise, I’d hazard a guess that the real world fuel economy isn’t so different between the two models. My “2” is two years old, has done 40k miles and is delivering about 58-60 mpg for my 11 mile country roads drive to work, or about 46-50 mpg if hooned at 80mph on continental motorways.

Be interested to hear how your fuel economy compares.


AlanW55
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 4:31 pm

Re: Hello

Post by AlanW55 » Fri Sep 13, 2019 9:32 pm

I'm getting similar figures to djbobbins on 18" wheels. Does the "2" have the eco 16" wheels? If so, the guess about real world economy is probably correct.
UK 2017 First Edition HEV in pearlescent white, standard spec.


djbobbins
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 7:57 pm

Re: Hello

Post by djbobbins » Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:30 pm

Yes, the 2017 “2” has the 16” wheels. I know a lot of the fuel economy impact will be down to driving style, use of air con etc. I have had over the 72mpg published average from my car but only on specific occasions (long trips on the motorway with large sections of 50mph average speed cameras).


kennyg
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:29 am

Re: Hello

Post by kennyg » Mon Sep 16, 2019 2:14 pm

Thanks for your prompt replies. I am still on the first tank of fuel so definitely early days yet. The reading is 57 mpg which included two shopping trips at 30mph in Darlington and a return trip to Knaresborough (80 miles) on the A1 at 70 mph so perhaps I am in the right ball park after all.
Starting to enjoy the OTT features such as smart Cruise Control and Lane Keep Assist so I had better start realaxing and enjoying the experience.


kennyg
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:29 am

Re: Hello

Post by kennyg » Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:17 pm

Could I ask djbobbins how many miles did you get out of your 16" tyres. My car is two years old and had two front tyres at 16k miles.( 18" wheels)


AlanW55
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2017 4:31 pm

Re: Hello

Post by AlanW55 » Fri Sep 20, 2019 7:13 pm

My front 18" Michelins got down to 3mm at 23,000 miles, then I changed them. I'm fastidious about the pressures being correct, and would describe my driving style as 'leisurely'.
UK 2017 First Edition HEV in pearlescent white, standard spec.


djbobbins
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 7:57 pm

Re: Hello

Post by djbobbins » Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:26 am

My 16” tyres were changed at 2.5mm tread or thereabouts (it’s a Lex Autolease car and they won’t change them before that).

I’d done about 29k miles at the time, albeit a good few thousand of that (4K, at least) on two European road trips with long stints of motorway driving at constant speed, which I surmise would be easier on the tyres than the acceleration and braking of day to day use.


djbobbins
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 7:57 pm

Re: Hello

Post by djbobbins » Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:28 am

Also, I think the standard fit tyres are types / brands between the 16 and 18 inch wheels, no? If so that would have to be a factor in the tyre life as well.


kennyg
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:29 am

Re: Hello

Post by kennyg » Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:51 pm

Thanks everyone. I used to have a Fiat Croma with 225 45 18 and was lucky to get 20k hence I would have preferred the 16" but 23k versus 29k does not seem too bad. Not sure how my previous owner got 16k but that was over 24 months so perhaps it was lots of short journeys with lots of manoeuvring


Post Reply

Return to “Introductions”